History & Workings of the Supreme Court

Photo by Claire Anderson on Unsplash

At the top of American Government, there sits 7 individuals with a profound set of powers and responsibilities. The individuals comprise the most powerful judiciary body in the world, the Supreme Court of the United States. Beholden to the law, the American public puts their faith in the honor and objectivity of these justices. As the famously instrumental Chief Justice John Marshall put it, they are tasked with “expounding” the constitution, a 200-year-old document that remains the ultimate law of the land today. It was Chief Justice Marshall’s Court that gave themselves the ability to strike down an act of Congress as unconstitutional, forever changing the balance of American law. And though they disagree, there is a crucial, mutual respect for their common goal: preserving and protecting American liberty .

Each week, the justices are delivered a fateful mountain of more than 100 new cases from lower courts. Although they have a small group of people assisting them, the justices are proudly responsible for each individual case equally – no matter who or where the case came from. The cases selected go beyond merely those they believe to be potentially unjust; the case must pose a question of national significance. This is why such a small number of cases are accepted by the Court; a number that’s dwindling each year. Justices are adamant to point out that the acceptance or denial of a case has no bearing on their opinion of the outcome decided by lower courts; it is merely an issue of overwhelming demand. But what does “national significance” actually entail?

Photo by Matt Popovich on Unsplash

Some of these cases are expectedly high-profile, such in 2000 as when SCOTUS stepped in for the first time in U.S. history to decide the outcome of a presidential election. Other cases fall under the Court’s responsibility to ensure that federal law is enforced equally throughout the nation, hence why, when various circuit courts make contradictory decisions on federal law, those “circuit split” cases often make it to the top.

Clearly, the few cases that ultimately reach the Court present the Justices with profoundly impactful choices, making these individuals some of the most impactful in the world. The pressure they feel is inevitably immense, but the crucial job they do will go down in history, even if the public only reads the headlines.

Comments

The Growing Dangers of Media Consolidation

Every week we see a new headline highlighting a new deal, acquisition, or merger of some big-name media companies. It’s nearly impossible to pin down an accurate map of these ownerships, as new deals are so frequently changing the corporate media landscape. Sometimes, especially in the short-term, these deals can appear to work out well for the consumer. More often, however, they can prevent innovation and competition at best, while outright undermining our democracy at worst. http://frankwbaker.com/The%20big%20picture.jpg There really is no more exemplary candidate than AT&T. I would wager that most people my age are unaware that AT&T was founded by none other than Alexander Graham Bell, originally being called the Bell Telephone Company. Bell gradually accrued market dominance by either refusing to work with and/or buying out competitors , eventually rebranding to the American Telephone & Telegraph Company. Even after the formation of the ...

Reflections & Concerns of Digital Nativity

Photo by Oleg Magni on Unsplash I have a complicated relationship with social media, but one that is far from unique. About once a year, I find myself on an anti-social media crusade, only to spend the rest of the year allowing it to slowly creep back into my life. I really do resent it – the way I can actively feel myself unable to pull away, even when I’m hyper-aware that it’s not making me happy. Have you ever closed an app, only to immediately reopen that same app? It makes you feel like a lab rat, sat in the same cage all day hitting the same “reward” button over and over. Especially during a pandemic, limited to the world between my four walls for the last 10 months, I’ve found it nearly impossible to entirely forgo scrolling away my time. What I notice when I delete those apps, however, always surprises me. More than I ever could have conceived, the ever-so-subtle emotional manipulation involved in using ...

The Failure of the Modern Marketplace of Ideas

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash Fair warning: there is no hiding my personal politics on this one. I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the concept of the Marketplace of Ideas. It’s hard not to, when arguably living in the most information-accessible period in all of history, wonder how we find ourselves divided into strict camps, all equally, intensely convinced of entirely perpendicular realities of the world. Even after Trump’s presidency is over, it’s depressingly clear that his reign over the willing minds of millions of Americans will continue. It’s also clear that no matter who’s in the White House, morally-bankrupt pawns like Giuliani will continue to spew unhinged, unfounded propaganda for however long it keeps them relevant. They are not doing this in a void – millions of people are listening to and believing in their lies, deepening the rift between citizens to a dangerous level. Globally, there are instances ...

Jack's Blob

Search This Blog