Skip to main content

History & Workings of the Supreme Court

 Photo by Claire Anderson on Unsplash

At the top of American Government, there sits 7 individuals with a profound set of powers and responsibilities. The individuals comprise the most powerful judiciary body in the world, the Supreme Court of the United States. Beholden to the law, the American public puts their faith in the honor and objectivity of these justices. As the famously instrumental Chief Justice John Marshall put it, they are tasked with “expounding” the constitution, a 200-year-old document that remains the ultimate law of the land today. It was Chief Justice Marshall’s Court that gave themselves the ability to strike down an act of Congress as unconstitutional, forever changing the balance of American law. And though they disagree, there is a crucial, mutual respect for their common goal: preserving and protecting American liberty .


Each week, the justices are delivered a fateful mountain of more than 100 new cases from lower courts. Although they have a small group of people assisting them, the justices are proudly responsible for each individual case equally – no matter who or where the case came from. The cases selected go beyond merely those they believe to be potentially unjust; the case must pose a question of national significance. This is why such a small number of cases are accepted by the Court; a number that’s dwindling each year. Justices are adamant to point out that the acceptance or denial of a case has no bearing on their opinion of the outcome decided by lower courts; it is merely an issue of overwhelming demand. But what does “national significance” actually entail?


Photo by Matt Popovich on Unsplash

Some of these cases are expectedly high-profile, such in 2000 as when SCOTUS stepped in for the first time in U.S. history to decide the outcome of a presidential election. Other cases fall under the Court’s responsibility to ensure that federal law is enforced equally throughout the nation, hence why, when various circuit courts make contradictory decisions on federal law, those “circuit split” cases often make it to the top. 

 

Clearly, the few cases that ultimately reach the Court present the Justices with profoundly impactful choices, making these individuals some of the most impactful in the world. The pressure they feel is inevitably immense, but the crucial job they do will go down in history, even if the public only reads the headlines.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Failure of the Modern Marketplace of Ideas

Photo by  Markus Spiske  on  Unsplash   Fair warning: there is no hiding my personal politics on this one. I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the concept of the Marketplace of Ideas. It’s hard  not  to, when arguably living in the most information-accessible period in all of history, wonder how we find ourselves divided into strict camps, all equally, intensely convinced of  entirely  perpendicular realities of the world. Even after Trump’s presidency is over, it’s depressingly clear that his reign over the willing minds of millions of Americans will continue. It’s also clear that no matter who’s in the White House, morally-bankrupt pawns like Giuliani will continue to spew unhinged, unfounded propaganda for however long it keeps them relevant. They are not doing this in a void – millions of people are listening to and  believing  in their lies, deepening the rift between citizens to a dangerous level. Globally, there are instances ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Rise of the Mixtape

  Engineer Lou Ottens. Image courtesy of  AD.nl   When the compact cassette first debuted, it wasn’t an entirely novel innovation. As its name might suggest, Lou Ottens sought to improve upon the bulky, often unreliable 1958 tape cassette system from RCA.     The inspiration for innovation came from perhaps the most human desire of all: convenience.  Phillips was interested in a potential market for a portable tape recorder, and after the speaker and batteries, the decreased dimensions hardly left room for the tape itself: a mere 2 x 4.5 inch space. To match the volumetric capacity of vinyl records, designers chose to, in the most analog way possible, compress the audio data in their novel tapes. By opting for a smaller stretch of tape per second of audio – 2 inches of tape compared to the then studio-standard 15 inches – the compact cassette traded some audio quality for the boost in portability.   Under pressure from Sony, Phillips allowed the J...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why You Should Trust Self-Driving Cars

Living in 2020, self-driving cars are admittedly difficult to trust. The same way humans were wary of hot air balloons in 1783, the steam locomotive in 1801, and the automobile itself in 1886 (which reassuringly crashed into a wall during Karl Benz’s first public demonstration). This skepticism is nothing new, and is inseparably bound with the notion of innovation - especially in transportation. The hesitant disbelief undoubtedly felt by the ancient people gazing upon the first canoes more than likely parallels that of the onlookers to the first commercial flight in 1914. We often judge through the omniscient lens of hindsight, mindlessly blaming our ancestors for their inability to see the future, and scoff at their ignorance. Entering new domains of transportation is  inherently  intimidating, and autonomous vehicles are no exception. While the idea of humans relinquishing total control of the vehicle appears alien and alarming, close inspection into the subject reveals a ...
Post a Comment
Read more