Jack's Blob

  Every week we see a new headline highlighting a new deal, acquisition, or merger of some big-name media companies. It’s nearly impossible to pin down an accurate map of these ownerships, as new deals are so frequently changing the corporate media landscape. Sometimes, especially in the short-term, these deals can appear to work out well for the consumer. More often, however, they can prevent innovation and competition at best, while outright undermining our democracy at worst.     http://frankwbaker.com/The%20big%20picture.jpg   There really is no more exemplary candidate than AT&T. I would wager that most people my age are unaware that AT&T was founded by none other than Alexander Graham Bell, originally being called the Bell Telephone Company. Bell gradually accrued market dominance by either  refusing to work with and/or buying out competitors , eventually rebranding to the American Telephone & Telegraph Company. Even after the formation of the Federal Communications C

  “There are only two industries that call their customers ‘users’: illegal drugs and software.” -         Edward Tufte   Photo by  Markus Spiske  on  Unsplash   When it comes to the sanctity of your digital privacy, I don’t even know where to begin on the rapidly increasing list of exploitations.    A commonly touted phrase around Silicon Valley goes, “If you’re not  paying  for the product, you  are  the product.” The truth is, you aren’t giving Facebook any money –  advertisers  are. So who might the app  really  designed to best serve? You, or their customers?   The goal of these tech giants is not to make Google, Twitter, or Instagram into the “best” app they can – it’s to collect as much attention into one spot as they can figure out how to. Every feature is a means to that end: attention,  not  satisfaction.   Social media websites are advertiser-funded fly traps, designed not to help us, but merely to squeeze as much attention from our day as possible. The big question: how are

  Photo by  Heidi Fin  on  Unsplash   For the last hundred or so years, give or take, $10 has just about always bought a single album. $10 vinyl records, $10 cassette tapes, and though CDs became a bit more expensive, iTunes eventually returned to a $10 average offering for their novel service. Now, for the same price, I get access to just about every song ever published, whenever I want. How did we get here?   When Spotify first arrived on the scene offering a service to stream your favorite songs from the internet, it felt like a weird, impractical way to pay for your music. I have to  keep paying ? And  never  actually own it? Yeah, I think I’ll pass. And I wasn’t alone – it took Spotify  more than two years after launch to convince any A series investors  that the music business could be fruitful.   However, being the grubby little new-tech-lover I was, it wasn’t long before I found myself asking for a Spotify subscription for Christmas. Once I adopted it – and before the advent of

  Engineer Lou Ottens. Image courtesy of  AD.nl   When the compact cassette first debuted, it wasn’t an entirely novel innovation. As its name might suggest, Lou Ottens sought to improve upon the bulky, often unreliable 1958 tape cassette system from RCA.     The inspiration for innovation came from perhaps the most human desire of all: convenience.  Phillips was interested in a potential market for a portable tape recorder, and after the speaker and batteries, the decreased dimensions hardly left room for the tape itself: a mere 2 x 4.5 inch space. To match the volumetric capacity of vinyl records, designers chose to, in the most analog way possible, compress the audio data in their novel tapes. By opting for a smaller stretch of tape per second of audio – 2 inches of tape compared to the then studio-standard 15 inches – the compact cassette traded some audio quality for the boost in portability.   Under pressure from Sony, Phillips allowed the Japanese tech giant license to produce h