Skip to main content

Your (Lack of) Internet Privacy

 “There are only two industries that call their customers ‘users’: illegal drugs and software.”

-       Edward Tufte

 

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

 

When it comes to the sanctity of your digital privacy, I don’t even know where to begin on the rapidly increasing list of exploitations. 

 

A commonly touted phrase around Silicon Valley goes, “If you’re not paying for the product, you are the product.” The truth is, you aren’t giving Facebook any money – advertisers are. So who might the app really designed to best serve? You, or their customers?

 

The goal of these tech giants is not to make Google, Twitter, or Instagram into the “best” app they can – it’s to collect as much attention into one spot as they can figure out how to. Every feature is a means to that end: attention, not satisfaction.

 

Social media websites are advertiser-funded fly traps, designed not to help us, but merely to squeeze as much attention from our day as possible. The big question: how are these companies supposed to predict what will attract the most users? The answer: lots, and lots, of data.

 

Many people erroneously assume that it’s that data being collected from us that’s the product. While there are massive data brokers that specialize in exactly that, many of the major tech companies are interested in a much different goal: prediction power. With such an ability being a direct factor of the amount of data you can feed your algorithms, there is immeasurable financial incentive for companies to violate your privacy in every legal (or illegal) way they can.


Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash

 

Many of us are quite sure that, while this is a big issue, we aren’t actively succumbing to the will of tech giants. The truth is, just like magicians with a deck of cards, our feeds provide us with a convincing illusion of choice, while deceptively leading us directly where they intend the entire time. In the industry, this design philosophy is known as “persuasive technology,” and it has been dominating Silicon Valley standard playbooks for the last decade. As many of us have likely experienced personally, this has created an apparent disparity in concern over privacy between generations. Young people who have grown up with these technologies don’t know a world other than one where the very concept of communication is inseparably bound to deceitful manipulation at the hands of a third party; priming an entire generation to be more willingly complacent in their own undoing. 

 

As a final note, I must stress the extent to which this short article barely scratches the tip of the Internet privacy iceberg. If you’d like to learn more, I cannot recommend the Netflix original documentary “The Social Dilemma” enough – though certainly not without its valid criticisms, it is by far the most comprehensive, unsettling piece I’ve seen on the issue for being as relatively succinct as it is. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Growing Dangers of Media Consolidation

  Every week we see a new headline highlighting a new deal, acquisition, or merger of some big-name media companies. It’s nearly impossible to pin down an accurate map of these ownerships, as new deals are so frequently changing the corporate media landscape. Sometimes, especially in the short-term, these deals can appear to work out well for the consumer. More often, however, they can prevent innovation and competition at best, while outright undermining our democracy at worst.     http://frankwbaker.com/The%20big%20picture.jpg   There really is no more exemplary candidate than AT&T. I would wager that most people my age are unaware that AT&T was founded by none other than Alexander Graham Bell, originally being called the Bell Telephone Company. Bell gradually accrued market dominance by either  refusing to work with and/or buying out competitors , eventually rebranding to the American Telephone & Telegraph Company. Even after the formation of the Federal Communications C
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did the Anti-War movement go?

Photo by  Stijn Swinnen  on  Unsplash   Being born in the year 2000 gives me an interesting, warped perspective on U.S. foreign occupancy and the concept of “war” in general.    Without a doubt, both the World Wars and the Vietnam War seem like some of the most hellish, gut-wrenching low points in human history. It’s really hard to overstate how disturbing it was learning about the conditions of these conflicts.  Operation Wandering Soul  was infamously used by the U.S. as a tactic of psychological warfare; content warning, listening to the “ ghost tapes ” can be genuinely disturbing. If you’ve got the time, here’s a captivating clip of a Vietnam vet recounting his experience oversees, and specifically how it differed from the narrative Americans were being fed back home:   In my mind, it’s quite understandable that such conflicts were met with passionate anti-war movements. When I look around now, however, there’s nearly  no  discussion of the concept. How did we get here? Where did a
Post a Comment
Read more

The Rise of the Mixtape

  Engineer Lou Ottens. Image courtesy of  AD.nl   When the compact cassette first debuted, it wasn’t an entirely novel innovation. As its name might suggest, Lou Ottens sought to improve upon the bulky, often unreliable 1958 tape cassette system from RCA.     The inspiration for innovation came from perhaps the most human desire of all: convenience.  Phillips was interested in a potential market for a portable tape recorder, and after the speaker and batteries, the decreased dimensions hardly left room for the tape itself: a mere 2 x 4.5 inch space. To match the volumetric capacity of vinyl records, designers chose to, in the most analog way possible, compress the audio data in their novel tapes. By opting for a smaller stretch of tape per second of audio – 2 inches of tape compared to the then studio-standard 15 inches – the compact cassette traded some audio quality for the boost in portability.   Under pressure from Sony, Phillips allowed the Japanese tech giant license to produce h
Post a Comment
Read more