Skip to main content

Your (Lack of) Internet Privacy

 “There are only two industries that call their customers ‘users’: illegal drugs and software.”

-       Edward Tufte

 

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

 

When it comes to the sanctity of your digital privacy, I don’t even know where to begin on the rapidly increasing list of exploitations. 

 

A commonly touted phrase around Silicon Valley goes, “If you’re not paying for the product, you are the product.” The truth is, you aren’t giving Facebook any money – advertisers are. So who might the app really designed to best serve? You, or their customers?

 

The goal of these tech giants is not to make Google, Twitter, or Instagram into the “best” app they can – it’s to collect as much attention into one spot as they can figure out how to. Every feature is a means to that end: attention, not satisfaction.

 

Social media websites are advertiser-funded fly traps, designed not to help us, but merely to squeeze as much attention from our day as possible. The big question: how are these companies supposed to predict what will attract the most users? The answer: lots, and lots, of data.

 

Many people erroneously assume that it’s that data being collected from us that’s the product. While there are massive data brokers that specialize in exactly that, many of the major tech companies are interested in a much different goal: prediction power. With such an ability being a direct factor of the amount of data you can feed your algorithms, there is immeasurable financial incentive for companies to violate your privacy in every legal (or illegal) way they can.


Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash

 

Many of us are quite sure that, while this is a big issue, we aren’t actively succumbing to the will of tech giants. The truth is, just like magicians with a deck of cards, our feeds provide us with a convincing illusion of choice, while deceptively leading us directly where they intend the entire time. In the industry, this design philosophy is known as “persuasive technology,” and it has been dominating Silicon Valley standard playbooks for the last decade. As many of us have likely experienced personally, this has created an apparent disparity in concern over privacy between generations. Young people who have grown up with these technologies don’t know a world other than one where the very concept of communication is inseparably bound to deceitful manipulation at the hands of a third party; priming an entire generation to be more willingly complacent in their own undoing. 

 

As a final note, I must stress the extent to which this short article barely scratches the tip of the Internet privacy iceberg. If you’d like to learn more, I cannot recommend the Netflix original documentary “The Social Dilemma” enough – though certainly not without its valid criticisms, it is by far the most comprehensive, unsettling piece I’ve seen on the issue for being as relatively succinct as it is. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Failure of the Modern Marketplace of Ideas

Photo by  Markus Spiske  on  Unsplash   Fair warning: there is no hiding my personal politics on this one. I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the concept of the Marketplace of Ideas. It’s hard  not  to, when arguably living in the most information-accessible period in all of history, wonder how we find ourselves divided into strict camps, all equally, intensely convinced of  entirely  perpendicular realities of the world. Even after Trump’s presidency is over, it’s depressingly clear that his reign over the willing minds of millions of Americans will continue. It’s also clear that no matter who’s in the White House, morally-bankrupt pawns like Giuliani will continue to spew unhinged, unfounded propaganda for however long it keeps them relevant. They are not doing this in a void – millions of people are listening to and  believing  in their lies, deepening the rift between citizens to a dangerous level. Globally, there are instances ...

The Rise of the Mixtape

  Engineer Lou Ottens. Image courtesy of  AD.nl   When the compact cassette first debuted, it wasn’t an entirely novel innovation. As its name might suggest, Lou Ottens sought to improve upon the bulky, often unreliable 1958 tape cassette system from RCA.     The inspiration for innovation came from perhaps the most human desire of all: convenience.  Phillips was interested in a potential market for a portable tape recorder, and after the speaker and batteries, the decreased dimensions hardly left room for the tape itself: a mere 2 x 4.5 inch space. To match the volumetric capacity of vinyl records, designers chose to, in the most analog way possible, compress the audio data in their novel tapes. By opting for a smaller stretch of tape per second of audio – 2 inches of tape compared to the then studio-standard 15 inches – the compact cassette traded some audio quality for the boost in portability.   Under pressure from Sony, Phillips allowed the J...

Why You Should Trust Self-Driving Cars

Living in 2020, self-driving cars are admittedly difficult to trust. The same way humans were wary of hot air balloons in 1783, the steam locomotive in 1801, and the automobile itself in 1886 (which reassuringly crashed into a wall during Karl Benz’s first public demonstration). This skepticism is nothing new, and is inseparably bound with the notion of innovation - especially in transportation. The hesitant disbelief undoubtedly felt by the ancient people gazing upon the first canoes more than likely parallels that of the onlookers to the first commercial flight in 1914. We often judge through the omniscient lens of hindsight, mindlessly blaming our ancestors for their inability to see the future, and scoff at their ignorance. Entering new domains of transportation is  inherently  intimidating, and autonomous vehicles are no exception. While the idea of humans relinquishing total control of the vehicle appears alien and alarming, close inspection into the subject reveals a ...